Toby v. State

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE FILED R.B. TOBY, * Appellant, * C.C.A.#03C01-9711-CC-00507 August 17, 1998 VS. * SEVIER COUNTY STATE OF TENNESSEE, * Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellee. * Appellate C ourt Clerk ORDER The petitioner, R.B. Toby, proceeding pro se, appeals as of right from the Sevier County Criminal Court’s dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. The record reflects that the petitioner pled guilty to two counts of vehicular homicide, one count of vehic ular assault, an d one count o f violating the Hab itual Motor Vehic le Statute on January 13, 1994. By plea agreement, he received an aggregate sentence of fifteen (15) years in the Department of Correction. The sentence included two concurrent ten (10) year sentences for each vehicular hom icide conviction, a five (5) year consecutive sentence for the vehicular assault conviction, and a concurrent four (4) year sentence for the habitual mo tor vehicle offen der conviction . The petitioner did not appeal the sentence bu t filed a petition for pos t- conviction relief on October 23, 1996. He alleged that the indictments upon which he was convicted were fatally deficient in failin g to state the term of the grand jury and in failing to adequately state the facts surrounding the offense. In dismissing the petition without an evidentiar y hearing, the trial cour t concluded tha t the petition was not time ly filed and that the petitioner’s claims did not present any exception to the statute of limitations. After full consideration of the record, the briefs, and the law governing the issues presented, we are of the opinion that the record supports the trial court’s actions and that no precedential value would be derived from the rendering of an opinion. The petition was filed ou tside the statute of lim itations, see T.C.A. § 40-30-202, and the petitioner’s claim s do not fall unde r any of the exception s to the statute of limitatio ns, see T.C.A. § 40-30 -202(b). It is , therefor e, ORDER ED that the judgm ent of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rules. Due to the petitioner’s indigence, costs shall be taxed to the state. Gary R. Wade, Judge CONCUR: Joseph M. Tipton, Judge David H. Welles, Judge