United States v. Robert Rushie

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7296 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERT EVERTON RUSHIE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:00-cr-00396-NCT-1) Submitted: October 7, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Everton Rushie, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Everton Rushie appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motions for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rushie, No. 1:00-cr- 00396-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. May 30, 2013). We deny Rushie’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2