Gate National Bank, 85 Nev. 345, 349-50, 455 P.2d 31, 33 (1969), when it
determined the reasonableness of SDK's attorney fees. No other aspect of
the previous order of affirmance was disturbed in the order granting
rehearing. On remand, the district court considered the Brunzell factors,
adjudicated the lien, and entered judgment in favor of SDK for $37,439.84.
Garmong again appealed.
We have considered the parties' arguments and the record in
this appeal and conclude that on remand the district court properly
followed this court's mandate and did not abuse its discretion when it
considered the Brunzell factors and entered judgment in SDK's favor.
Argentena Consol. Mining Co. v. Jolley Urga Wirth Woodbury & Standish,
125 Nev. 527, 531, 216 P.3d 779, 782 (2009) ("[The district court's]
attorney fees award is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.").
Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'
Parraguirre Cherry
1-Garmong's August 20, 2013, motion for leave to file a reply to SDK's
response to the notice of supplemental authorities is granted. The clerk of
this court shall detach and file the reply attached to Garmong's motion.
We have considered Garmong's other arguments and conclude that
they do not warrant reversal.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
cc: Hon. Michael P. Gibbons, District Judge
David Wasick, Settlement Judge
Carl M. Hebert
Woodburn & Wedge
Les W. Bradshaw
Silverman, Decaria & Kattelman, Chtd.
Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg
Douglas County Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A