Decision will be entered under
RUWE, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency and additions to tax with respect to petitioner's Federal income tax:
*243 Additions to Tax | ||||
Year | Deficiency | |||
2008 | $144,366 | $10,045.12 | 1$6,473.52 | $1,078.73 |
1The amount of any addition to tax pursuant to
After concessions, 1 the issues for decision are: (1) whether petitioner is liable for the additions to tax under
Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference.
At the time the petition was filed, petitioner resided in New Jersey.
*244 Petitioner delinquently filed his 2007 Federal income tax return on February 15, 2011, reporting an overpayment of $12,479. 3 Of this amount, petitioner requested that $7,479 be refunded to him and that $5,000 be applied to his 2008 estimated tax. Respondent refunded the entire amount of the overpayment, $12,479, in July 2011.
Petitioner was employed by Symantec Corp. during the 2008 taxable year. Petitioner did not timely file a Federal income tax return for 2008. 4*251 Respondent prepared a substitute for return (SFR) for 2008 on the basis of information returns filed by third-party payors with the Internal Revenue Service.
On November 28, 2011, respondent issued to petitioner a notice of deficiency. On February 27, 2012, petitioner filed a joint income tax return with his wife for the 2008 taxable year. The joint return reported a tax liability of $114,812. The parties agree that this is the correct tax liability. Respondent assessed the tax shown on the joint return, as well as additions to tax pursuant to
*245 On the joint 2008 Federal income tax return petitioner claimed withheld tax of $99,683 and a $5,000 payment to be applied from his 2007 return. Petitioner reported $10,129 as the amount of unpaid tax on line 75 of the joint return. 5 However, in July 2011, prior to filing the 2008 return on February 27, 2012, petitioner received as a refund the $5,000 he had claimed as a payment to be applied from his 2007 return. Therefore, respondent determined that $15,129 was the amount required to be shown as unpaid tax on line 75 of the 2008 return. Consequently, respondent assessed the
Respondent has the burden of production with respect to the
Petitioner filed a joint Federal income tax return for the 2008 taxable year on February 27, 2012. Petitioner's 2008 tax return was required to be filed by April 15, 2009, to be timely. See
Petitioner has not produced any evidence indicating that his failure to file a timely return was due to reasonable cause. Instead, petitioner argues that the $5,000 he claimed as a payment to be applied from his 2007 return, which he *247 received as a refund in July 2011, should be subtracted from the amount required to be shown as tax on the 2008 return in calculating the addition to tax under
In the case of any overpayment, the Secretary, within the applicable period of limitations, may credit the amount of such overpayment, including any interest allowed thereon, against any liability in *254 respect of an internal revenue tax on the part of the person who made the overpayment and shall * * * refund any balance to such person. [Emphasis added.]
The Commissioner had the discretion to refund the *255 $5,000 that petitioner elected to be applied to his 2008 estimated tax liability. 6 Since the Commissioner refunded the entire amount of the overpayment from petitioner's 2007 return, no amount of the overpayment can be applied to petitioner's 2008 tax liability. As a result, for purposes of calculating the addition to tax under
Petitioner has not paid any amount of the $15,129 that respondent determined was required to be shown as unpaid tax on his return. Therefore, respondent has met his burden of production.
Petitioner has not produced any evidence indicating that his failure to pay was due to reasonable cause. Instead, petitioner argues that the $5,000 he claimed as a payment to be applied from his 2007 return, which he received as a refund in July 2011, should be subtracted from the amount required to be shown as tax on his return in calculating the addition to tax under
As we have previously noted, petitioner received a refund of the 2007 overpayment; *257 therefore, no amount of the overpayment can be applied to *250 petitioner's 2008 tax liability. As a result, for purposes of calculating the addition to tax under
In reaching our decision, we have considered all arguments made by the parties, and to the extent not mentioned or addressed, they are irrelevant or without merit.
To reflect the foregoing,
Decision will be entered under
Footnotes
1. Respondent concedes that petitioner is not liable for the
sec. 6654(a)↩ addition to tax. Petitioner and respondent have agreed that the tax deficiency is $114,812.2. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.
3. Petitioner's 2007 tax return was required to be filed on April 15, 2008, to be timely. See
sec. 6072(a)↩ .4. We note that petitioner also did not timely file his Federal income tax returns for the taxable years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2006, and 2007. In
Ruggeri v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2008-300">T.C. Memo. 2008-300 , this Court held that petitioner was liable for additions to tax undersec. 6651(a)(1) and(2)↩ for the taxable year 2002.5. Tax liability of $114,812 minus $99,683 of withheld tax minus a claimed $5,000 payment to be applied from his 2007 tax return = $10,129.↩
6. We note that the notice of deficiency for 2008 was not issued until November 28, 2011, which was several months after the Commissioner refunded the 2007 overpayment in July 2011.↩
7. The amount of the addition to tax under
sec. 6651(a)(2) reduces the amount of the addition to tax undersec. 6651(a)(1) for any month for which an addition to tax applies under both paragraphs.Sec. 6651(c)(1)↩ .