IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-10610
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
NASRULLAH OMER MALIK,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
(2:95-CR-52-1)
_________________________________________________________________
December 17, 1996
Before KING, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Nasrullah Omer Malik was convicted for making a materially
false statement to Boatmen’s First National Bank of Amarillo
(Boatmen’s) for the purpose of fraudulently making a loan in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014. On appeal, Malik challenges the
sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction.
A conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1014 requires the Government
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that: (1) the defendant made
a false statement to a federally insured financial institution;
(2) defendant made the false statement knowingly; (3) he did so
for the purpose of influencing the financial institution’s
action; and (4) the statement was false as to a material fact.
United States v. Williams, 12 F.3d 452, 456 (5th Cir. 1994). Our
review of the evidence shows that the jury could have found that
the evidence established Malik’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
United States v. Martinez, 975 F.2d 159, 160-61 (5th Cir. 1992),
cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 1346 (1993).
AFFIRMED.
2