Bickerstaff v. Whitney National Bnk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 96-30718 Summary Calendar _____________________ MADELINE BICKERSTAFF, on behalf of herself and all other individuals similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (94-CV-4141-J) _________________________________________________________________ December 17, 1996 Before KING, DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-appellant Madeline Bickerstaff appeals the district court’s order denying her motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) to vacate the summary judgment previously entered by the district court in favor of defendant-appellee The Whitney National Bank and affirmed by this court on appeal. Bickerstaff’s brief does not advance any argument or authority to * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. support her position that the district court abused its discretion in denying her motion. Out of an abundance of caution, we have reviewed the district court’s order and reasons and we are persuaded that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Bickerstaff’s motion. AFFIRMED. 2