IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-10592
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RANDY DALE WARREN,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:91-CR-339-P
- - - - - - - - - -
January 20, 1997
Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Randy Dale Warren appeals the district court’s decision to
revoke his supervised release and his sentence. Warren contends
that the district court denied him the right to confront and
cross-examine an adverse witness at his revocation hearing.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking
Warren’s supervised release. United States v. McCormick, 54 F.3d
214, 219 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 264 (1995). The
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-10592
- 2 -
record supports the district court’s implicit finding that good
cause existed to admit the evidence without allowing Warren the
opportunity to confront and cross-examine the witness. United
States v. Grandlund, 71 F.3d 507, 510 (5th Cir. 1995), cert.
denied, 116 S. Ct. 1031 (1996). Any error in the district
court’s evidentiary ruling was harmless. Kotteakos v. United
States, 328 U.S. 750, 765 (1946).
AFFIRMED.