UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 96-20374
Summary Calendar
AINSWORTH PALMER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
VICKEY MILLER, ET AL.,
Defendants,
VICKEY MILLER, Officer; AVERY HUFF, Officer;
HOUSTON CITY OF; WOODGATE ASSOCIATES, LTD,
doing business as Woodgate Apartments,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas
(CA-H-93-2997)
January 22, 1997
Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:1
Ainsworth Palmer appears the district court’s grant of summary
judgment for the City of Houston (City) and Woodgate Associates
1
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
Ltd. (Woodgate). We affirm the district court’s grant of the
City’s and Woodgate’s motions for summary judgment for
substantially the same reasons cited by the district court. Palmer
v. Miller, CA-H-93-2997, (S.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 1996).
Palmer also objects to the dismissal of Johnstown Investment
Corp. (JIC). Palmer’s appeal of this aspect of the decision is
dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 28(a)(6). See Moore v.
FDIC, 993 F.3d 106, 107 (5th Cir. 1993) (conclusional brief made
without reference to the record subject to dismissal); United
States v. Tomblin, 46 F.3d 1369, 1376 n.13 (5th Cir. 1995) (brief
must contain a legal argument that indicates the basis for each
contention).
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.
2