Legal Research AI

United States v. Davalos

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date filed: 1997-02-27
Citations: 109 F.3d 767
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases

                            No. 96-10905
                                - 1 -

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 96-10905
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,


versus


JORGE EDUARDO DAVALOS,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.


                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 2:96-CR-10-2
                       - - - - - - - - - -
                        February 24, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Jorge Eduardo Davalos was convicted of conspiracy to possess

with intent to distribute cocaine and possession of cocaine.      On

appeal, Davalos challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to

support his convictions.

     To prove the possession with intent to distribute charges

against Davalos, the Government was required to prove knowing

possession of the illegal substances with intent to distribute.


     *
        Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
United States v. Cardenas, 9 F.3d 1139, 1158 (5th Cir. 1993),

cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2150 (1994).   To prove the conspiracy

count, the Government was required to show an agreement to

violate the drug laws and that the defendant knew about it and

voluntarily joined and participated in it.   United States v.

Pierre, 958 F.2d 1304, 1311 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied,

506 U.S. 898 (1992).

     We conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found

that the evidence established guilt of these crimes beyond a

reasonable doubt.   United States v. Ivey, 949 F.2d 759, 766 (5th

Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 819 (1992).

     AFFIRMED.