Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. North Carolina Utilities Commission

Summarize

Check Treatment

Related Cases

Bellsouth Telecommunications, Incorporated, United States of America Federal Communications Commission, Intervenors v. North Carolina Utilities Commission, and Us Lecof North Carolina, Llc, Bellsouth Telecommunications, Incorporated, United States of America Federal Communications Commission, Intervenors v. North Carolina Utilities Commission, and Intermedia Communications, Bellsouth Telecommunications, Incorporated v. North Carolina Utilities Commission, McImetro Access Transmission Services, Incorporated, United States of America Federal Communications Commission, Intervenors. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Incorporated, United States of America Federal Communications Commission, Intervenors v. Us Lecof North Carolina, Llc, and North Carolina Utilities Commission
At & T Communications of Southern States, Inc. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
At&t Communications of the Southern States, Incorporated, and United States of America Federal Communications Commission, Intervenors/plaintiffs v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Incorporated North Carolina Utilities Commission Joanne Sanford Allyson K. Duncan Ralph A. Hunt Judy Hunt William Pittman, the Commissioners of the North Carolina Utilities Commission, in Their Official Capacities J. Richard Conder, Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission Robert v. Owens, Jr., Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission
At&T Communications of the Southern States, Inc. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
BellSouth Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission

535 U.S. 1091

BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
v.
NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION ET AL.

No. 00-1699.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 28, 2002.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Verizon Md. Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Md., ante, p. 635. JUSTICE O'CONNOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Reported below: 240 F. 3d 270.