IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-41202
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WINDY RAINEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:96-CR-9-2
- - - - - - - - - -
April 29, 1997
Before Wisdom, King, and Smith, Circuit Judges,
PER CURIAM:*
Windy Rainey argues that the district court (1) erred in
determining the drug quantity attributable to her under the
sentencing guidelines and (2) erred in refusing to reduce her
offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 based on her minor role in
the offense.
We have reviewed the record, including the presentence
report, the briefs and the transcript of the sentencing hearing,
*
The court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
No. 96-41202
- 2 -
and find that the district court’s determination that Rainey was
accountable for 250.20 grams of cocaine base was not clearly
erroneous.1 We further find that the district court did not err
in refusing to make an adjustment for Rainey’s role in the
offense.2
AFFIRMED
1
See United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1575 (5th
Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1113, 1825 (1995).
2
See United States v. Tremelling, 43 F.3d 148, 152-53
(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1990 (1995).