UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 97-40101
Summary Calendar
THOMAS GREISAMER, MD
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL AT GALVESTON; GEORGE T. BRYAN,
MD; JOAN C. LANG, MD; JAN BLALAOCK, PhD
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas
(G-96-CV-18)
May 30, 1997
Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:1
Plaintiff-Appellant sought damages from Defendants-Appellees
claiming discrimination under Title IX, Title VII and § 1983, and
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Defendants moved to
dismiss and for summary judgment. The district court granted the
motion to dismiss as to Bryan, Lang and Blaylock and as to all
1
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
defendants dismissed claims asserted under § 1983. Appellant does
not argue these claims or his Title IX claim on appeal. The
district court granted summary judgment in favor of the University
and only the claims against it under Title VII and the ADEA remain.
We have conducted a de novo review of the record and find no error.
Plaintiff offered no competent evidence to create any issue of
material fact. Additionally, the University offered a non-
pretextual reason for not renewing Dr. Greisamer’s contract as a
resident in psychiatry. Appellant contends that the district court
terminated discovery thereby depriving him of the opportunity to
gain information to create an issue of fact. This argument is not
persuasive. There were ten months during which discovery was
conducted. Additionally, Plaintiff did not suggest to the trial
court that he needed more time for discovery, nor does he suggest
to this court what information he would expect more discovery to
produce that he could use to create an issue of material fact.
AFFIRMED.
2