IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Nos. 95-11099 & 96-10217
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GARY WAYNE MINTER,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:95-CV-499-A
- - - - - - - - - -
July 18, 1997
Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gary Wayne Minter appeals from the district court’s denial
of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and from the district court’s
partial grant of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582. He argues that the district court abused its
discretion with regard to the extent of the reduction it ordered
to his sentence, that he was denied his statutory right to notice
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
No. 95-11099
No. 96-10217
- 2 -
of a possible sentence enhancement, that the district court erred
in its application of the sentencing guidelines, that his
sentence was calculated in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause,
and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because
his attorney failed to object to these issues or to raise them on
direct appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED. To the extent that a certificate of
appealability is required, it is DENIED.