United States v. Ochoa-Holguin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ________________________________ No. 96-50762 Summary Calendar ________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS OCHOA-HOLGUIN, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (EP-90-CR-333-2) _________________________________________________________________ July 9, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM*: Carlos Ochoa-Holguin, #51745-080, appeals, pro se, the district court’s amended criminal judgment after resentencing. The district court had the authority to resentence him on the remaining drug counts after granting his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion (based on vacating his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), pursuant to * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. Bailey v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995)), and remanding for resentencing. United States v. Rodriguez, No. 96-30878, 1997 WL 265121, (5th Cir. May 20, 1997). The district court did not clearly err in applying the U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) two-level upward adjustment for possession of a weapon. See United States v. Otero, 868 F.2d 1412 (5th Cir. 1989). And, Ochoa-Holguin did not object to the allegedly late disclosure of the presentence report. Accordingly, we review only for plain error. There was none. Among other things, any late disclosure did not affect Ochoa-Holguin’s substantial rights. United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). Finally, the resentencing transcript shows that the allegedly late disclosure of the amended presentence report did not affect Ochoa-Holguin’s ability to object to incorrect information about an alleged second weapon; and that Ochoa-Holguin did not otherwise receive ineffective assistance of counsel at resentencing. AFFIRMED