UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 97-20007
Summary Calendar
CLARICE COLLINS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS; UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, BOARD OF REGENTS;
TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE; CARDIOPULMONARY PERFUSION ASSOCIATES
INCORPORATED; ST. LUKE’S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL; BONNIE CROMACK;
VALERIE CARROLL; TRUDY STAFFORD; FRANCIS FRANZ; SAL GUERCIO;
ANN GUERCIO; RHONDA KENNAMER; JOYCE BIGLEY; KIMBERLY WADE
SWAN; CAROLYN LETHRIDGE; DEBRA SURPRISE; SUZIE GLEASON;
RAYMOND MCINNIS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas
(H-95-CV-715)
July 30, 1997
Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Collins sued the corporate and individual defendants in this
*
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
case, alleging "intentional discrimination, based on race, gender
and retaliation due to plaintiff’s past challenges and complaints
of racial discrimination." Each defendant filed motions for
summary judgment which were referred by the district court to the
magistrate judge for review and recommendation. The magistrate
judge recommended that all defendants’ motions for summary judgment
be granted and the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be
denied. The district court reviewed the magistrate judge’s
memorandum and recommendation de novo and entered an order adopting
the memorandum and recommendation.
We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts and
relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by
the magistrate judge in her memorandum and recommendation filed
under date of April 25, 1996, the district court was correct in
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendations and entering a
final judgment based thereon.
AFFIRMED.
2