UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 97-30677
Summary Calendar
_____________________
THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
versus
LANECO CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM INCORPORATED,
Defendants,
LANECO CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM INCORPORATED,
Defendant-Appellee,
versus
CARL E. WOODWARD, Incorporated,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
(94-CV-3338)
_________________________________________________________________
February 19, 1998
Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Carl E. Woodward, Incorporated, appeals the judgment
dismissing its cross-claim seeking indemnity and defense costs from
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
Laneco Construction Systems, Inc. Woodward contends that the
district court erred by concluding that the defense and immunity
provision of the Subcontract Agreement between Woodward and Laneco
is ambiguous.
Essentially for the reasons stated by the district court, The
Continental Ins. Co. v. Laneco Construction Systems, Inc., No. 94-
3338 (E.D. La. Apr. 24, 1997), the judgment is
AFFIRMED.