Robles v. Johnson

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-40178 Summary Calendar DAVID ROBLES, Petitioner-Appellant, versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CV-131 March 2, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:* David Robles, Texas prisoner # 193550, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus as abusive pursuant to Rule 9(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Robles argues that the district court erred by dismissing his petition as an abuse of the writ because he has shown that a * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-40178 -2- miscarriage of justice would result from the court’s failure to address the merits of his petition. We review a district court’s decision to dismiss a petition pursuant to Rule 9(b) for abuse of discretion. Hudson v. Whitley, 979 F.2d 1058, 1062 (5th Cir. 1992). Because Robles cannot make an “actual innocence” showing, as defined in Sawyer v. Whitley, 505 U.S. 333, 336 (1992), he fails to show that a fundamental miscarriage of justice would result from the court’s failure to address the merits of his petition. The district court’s judgment dismissing the petition as abusive pursuant to Rule 9(b) is AFFIRMED.