IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-11559
Summary Calendar
EDWARD CHARLES CROCKETT,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
M.A. THORNE, Officer,
Fort Worth Police Dep’t,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:91-CV-470-Y
- - - - - - - - - -
April 14, 1998
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Edward Charles Crockett, Texas prisoner # 615226, argues
that the district court abused its discretion during Crockett’s
civil rights trial by 1) denying his motion for appointment of
counsel; 2} refusing to subpoena Crockett’s requested witnesses;
3) refusing to allow Crockett to introduce deposition testimony
at trial; and 4) allowing the trial to proceed prior to
Crockett’s receipt of his medical records. Crockett also argues
that the district court’s credibility determinations at trial
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
were clearly erroneous because the defendants provided perjured
testimony.
We have reviewed the record provided to the court and the
briefs of the parties and affirm the rulings made in the district
court’s pretrial orders and also the judgment dismissing
Crockett’s civil rights complaint.
AFFIRMED.
2