Board of Ed. of City School Dist. of New York v. Tom F.

Check Treatment

Related Cases

John A. McWilliams v. New York City Board of Education
P.K. Ex Rel. S.K. v. New York City Department of Education
Peter Melzer v. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Carol A. Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Victor Gotbaum, Michael J. Petrides, Luis O. Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Dennis M. Walcott, Individually and in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Ramon Cortines, Individually and as Chancellor of the City School District of the City of New York, Joseph Dejesus, Individually and as Superintendent of the Bronx High Schools, Hollis Needleman, Individually and as Assistant Superintendent of the Bronx High Schools, Edward Stancik, Individually and as Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City School District and the City of New York
Dorothy Joseph v. New York City Board of Education
Elsa Gulino, Mayling Ralph and Peter Wilds, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Nia Greene v. New York State Education Department, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, Board of Education of the New York City School District of the City of New York, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee. Docket No. 03-9062-Cv

(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 552 U. S. ____ (2007) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 06–637 _________________ BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, PETITIONER v. TOM F., ON BEHALF OF GILBERT F., A MINOR CHILD ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT [October 10, 2007] PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. JUSTICE KENNEDY took no part in the decision of this case.