IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-60738
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DLOYS GIVHAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:96-CV-7-S
- - - - - - - - - -
April 9,1998
Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Federal prisoner Dloys Givhan (# 09244-042) appeals the
district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or
correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Givhan argues
that his 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) conviction must be reversed in
light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bailey v. United States,
516 U.S. 137 (1995), because the jury was erroneously instructed
as to the “use” prong of § 924(c)(1).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 97-60738
-2-
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
The district court instructed the jury as to the “carrying” prong
only. The court’s instructions regarding the use of a firearm
with respect to the “in relation to” prong are unaffected by
Bailey. United States v. Tolliver, 116 F.3d 120, 125 (5th Cir.)
(“Bailey did not address the ‘in relation to’ prong of
§ 924(c)(1). The pre-Bailey interpretation of the ‘in relation
to’ language therefore remains unaffected.”), cert. denied, 118
S. Ct. 324 (1997). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.