UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2138
HAROLD H. HODGE, JR.; CHANTE’ N. HODGE, Mrs.,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
CALVERT COUNTY, (local government); STATE OF MARYLAND;
MARYLAND STATE TREASURER; ST. MARY'S COUNTY, (local
government); TIMOTHY K. CAMERON, Head Sheriff in his
individual and public official capacity; THOMAS HEDDERICH,
Detective, in his individual and public official capacity;
WILLIAM RAY, Detective, in his individual and public
official capacity; UNKNOWN SWAT TEAM AND POLICE MEMBERS,
John Does in their individual and public official
capacities; MIKE EVANS, Head Sheriff, in his individual and
public official capacity; RICKEY COX, Deputy, Detective, in
his individual and public official capacity; RICKY THOMAS,
Lieutenant, in his individual and public official capacity;
SUTTON, Deputy or Sheriff, in his individual and public
official capacity; CANNING, Deputy Sheriff, in his
individual and public official capacity; FENTON, Deputy
Sheriff, in his individual and public official capacity;
UNKNOWN (SOT), SWAT TEAM MEMBER OF THE CLAVERT COUNTY
SHERIFF'S OFFICE, John Does in their individual and public
official capacities; ROBERT B. RIDDLE, Judge, in his
individual capacity and public official capacity; CALVERT
DETENTION CENTER; SHERIFF AND DEPUTY AND CORRECTIONAL
OFFICER, last name to be Fenton in his individual and public
official capacity; SHERIFF AND DEPUTY SUTTON, in his
individual and public official capacity,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:09-cv-02252-PJM)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 24, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold H. Hodge, Jr., Chante’ N. Hodge, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Harold H. Hodge, Jr., and Chante’ N. Hodge appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their civil action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Hodge v. Calvert County,
No. 8:09-cv-02252-PJM (D. Md. Sept. 4, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3