Portillo v. Holder

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 04 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OSCAR ORLANDO PORTILLO, No. 07-74424 Petitioner, Agency No. A095-449-397 v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted May 25, 2010 ** Before: CANBY, THOMAS and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. Oscar Orlando Portillo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, seeks review pro se of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Portillo failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his U.S. citizen children. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 979 (9th Cir. 2009). Portillo’s contentions, that the Board did not properly consider and weigh all evidence of hardship and that the government should have disclosed an alleged pending application for asylum at the time the removal order was issued, do not raise a colorable due process claim. Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 2