FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 06 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FRANCISCA SOFIA CANO-JOHNSON, No. 05-71028
Petitioner, Agency No. A078-278-692
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 29, 2010 **
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Francisca Sofia Cano-Johnson, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions
pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing
her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for
asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo
questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except
to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing
statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004).
We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453
F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part the
petition for review.
The record does not compel the conclusion that changed or extraordinary
circumstances excused the untimely filing of Cano-Johnson’s asylum application.
See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.4(a)(4), (5); Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 656-58
(9th Cir. 2007).
Substantial evidence supports the denial of withholding of removal because
Cano-Johnson did not demonstrate she was or would be subjected to persecution
by gang members or police on account of a protected ground. See Santos-Lemus,
542 F.3d at 746-47; Bolshakov v. INS, 133 F.3d 1279, 1281 (9th Cir. 1998)
(criminal street gang activity does not establish persecution on account of a
protected ground).
Substantial evidence supports the denial of CAT relief because Cano-
Johnson failed to present evidence that it is more likely than not she will be
2 05-71028
tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of Honduran government officials.
See Soriano v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1162, 1167 (9th Cir. 2009).
We lack jurisdiction to review Cano-Johnson’s contention that the IJ failed
to consider the death of her mother and siblings because she did not raise this claim
before the IJ or BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
3 05-71028