Carl Cavalli v. Roseanne Campbell

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 21 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CARL WAYNE CAVALLI, No. 08-16611 Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:06-cv-01700-ALA v. MEMORANDUM * ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Arthur L. Alarcón, Circuit Judge, Presiding Submitted June 29, 2010 ** Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. Carl Wayne Cavalli appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 2253 1, and we affirm. Appellee’s motions to dismiss the appeal and strike various documents are denied. Cavalli contends that the Governor’s 2005 decision to deny him parole was not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due process rights. The state court did not unreasonably determine that some evidence supports the Governor’s decision. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); see also Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 563 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc). AFFIRMED. 1 We certify for appeal the issue of whether the state court unreasonably determined that the Governor’s 2005 decision deny parole was supported by some evidence. We decline to certify any other issues raised by Cavalli. 2 08-16611