Corbitt v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

                                                                        [PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________           FILED
                                                   U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                No. 08-12199         ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                         JULY 27, 2010
                          ________________________
                                                          JOHN LEY
                                                            CLERK

DAVID W. CORBITT,
ALEXANDER J. RAYA, JR.,


                                                              Plaintiffs-Appellants,

                                      versus

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.,

                                                               Defendant-Appellee.

                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Alabama
                         _________________________



BEFORE: DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, BLACK,
CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR and MARTIN.

BY THE COURT:

      On July 19, 2010, the parties in the above-entitled appeal, filed a Joint

Motion to Dismiss Appeal with Prejudice. Upon consideration of those matters
contained in the parties’ joint motion, and for good cause shown, it is ORDERED

that said motion be and the same is hereby GRANTED. The panel opinion,

published in 589 F.3d 1136, had already been vacated by our order granting

rehearing en banc. Corbitt v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 598 F.3d 1259, 1259 (11th

Cir. 2010) (en banc). The judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is

remanded to the district court with instructions that the case be dismissed. See

Key Enterprises of Delaware, Inc. v. Venice Hospital, 9 F.3d 893, 894 & 898-99

(11th Cir. 1993) (en banc) (per curiam). Each party is to bear its own costs and

attorney’s fees, subject to any separate agreement by the parties.




                                          2