UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1948
LONG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
Petitioner,
v.
ESTIL STILTNER; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
PROGRAMS,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(08-0124-BLA)
Submitted: July 15, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald E. Gilbertson, K&L GATES, LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Petitioner. Joseph E. Wolfe, Ryan C. Gilligan, WOLFE, WILLIAMS,
RUTHERFORD & REYNOLDS, Norton, Virginia; Deborah Greenfield,
Acting Deputy Solicitor of Labor, Rae Ellen James, Associate
Solicitor, Sean G. Bajkowski, Helen H. Cox, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Long Construction Company seeks review of the Benefits
Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative
law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.
§§ 901-945 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the
Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is
without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review for the reasons stated by the Board. Stiltner v. Long
Constr. Co., No. 08-0124-BLA (B.R.B. Nov. 26, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2