UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1394
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF TAKOMA PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT; K. GILBERT; MR. WOLFF,
#8352; TERRY JOHNSSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:10-cv-00681-PJM)
Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 30, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Sindram seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying his request for a preliminary injunction
and dismissing his complaint without prejudice. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed.
1528 (1949). The order Sindram seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order
because it is possible for Sindram to cure the deficiencies in
the complaint as noted by the district court. See Domino Sugar
Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th
Cir. 1993).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2