United States v. Hendershot

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 02 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-30002 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. CR-06-00032-CCL v. MEMORANDUM * JAMES RALPH HENDERSHOT, III, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 19, 2010 ** Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. James Ralph Hendershot, III appeals from his 16-month sentence of imprisonment and three-year term of supervised release imposed following his jury-trial conviction for social security fraud in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(4) * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and theft of federal government money in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Contrary to Hendershot’s contention, the imposition of his term of supervised release does not violate the terms of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.1(d). We also reject Hendershot’s contention that his term of supervised release was not authorized by statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(a) (“The court . . . may include as a part of the sentence . . . a term of supervised release after imprisonment”); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b) (for a Class C or Class D felony, not more than three years of supervised release may be imposed). AFFIRMED. 2 08-30002