Schoeman v. Merit Systems Protection Board

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PATRICIA SCHOEMAN, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent, and OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Intervenor. _______________________ 2009-3297 _______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in AT0831090378-I-1 ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DAVID U. FIERST, Stein, Mitchell & Muse L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. STEPHANIE M. CONLEY, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were JAMES M. EISENMANN, General Counsel, and KEISHA DAWN BELL, Deputy General Counsel. JANE W. VANNEMAN, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. With her on the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and KIRK T. MANHARDT, Assistant Director. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 9, 2010 _/s/Jan Horbaly________________ Date Jan Horbaly Clerk