Harmon v. Hargett

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 5/8/96 TENTH CIRCUIT SONNY LAUREN HARMON, Petitioner-Appellant, No. 95-6463 v. (W. Dist. of Oklahoma) (D.C. No. CIV-95-429-C) STEVE HARGETT, Respondent-Appellee. ORDER AND JUDGMENT* Before ANDERSON, BARRETT, MURPHY, Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. 34.1.9. This case is therefore submitted without oral argument. * This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. Petitioner, a state prison inmate, appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner sought habeas relief on the grounds that 1) his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was violated by the trial court’s restriction of his attorney’s cross-examination of the State’s witnesses; 2) his right to a speedy trial was violated when the State was permitted to amend its Information and the case was remanded for a preliminary hearing; 3) his Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the trial court’s failure to sustain his motion to suppress evidence obtained during an inventory search of his vehicle; 4) the trial court erred by admitting fingerprint evidence for which no proper foundation was laid; and 5) that the prior conviction used to enhance his punishment was too remote to be used to enhance his sentence. The district court denied the petition and this appeal followed.1 Having carefully considered the record on appeal, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated in the magistrate’s Report and Recommendation dated November 15, 1995. The judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma is hereby AFFIRMED. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge We grant the issuance of a certificate of probable cause to reach the merits in this 1 case. 2