United States v. Jones

                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 97-30799
                           Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AL KING JONES,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                        - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                      USDC No. 96-CR-259-1-E
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                          August 24, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Al King Jones appeals his sentence following a guilty-plea

conviction of attempted possession of and conspiracy to

distribute cocaine.    Jones contends that the district court erred

in calculating his offense level based on a finding that his

offense involved five kilograms of cocaine.

     The presentence report (PSR) indicated that Jones told an

undercover officer that he had money to purchase three kilograms

of cocaine and wanted to purchase five kilograms of cocaine if

money became available to him.    PSR ¶ 12; see U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1,


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 97-30799
                                - 2 -

comment. (n.12).    If the defendant is convicted of conspiring to

purchase a controlled substance as part of a “reverse sting,” the

offense level is determined by “the agreed-upon quantity of the

controlled substance” being purchased.)

       The defendant bears the burden of demonstrating that

information in the PSR is materially untrue, inaccurate or

unreliable.    United States v.Angulo, 927 F.2d 202, 205 (5th Cir.

1991).    Jones presented no evidence to rebut the findings in the

PSR.    The district court did not clearly err in adopting the

findings in the PSR without further inquiry.    United States v.

Ayala, 47 F.3d 688, 690 (5th Cir. 1995).

       AFFIRMED.