United States v. Sauls

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-50931 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KEVIN WAYNE SAULS; DOUGLAS WAYNE EVANS; TONY CURTIS COLLINS; and DARREN MIGUEL TATE, Defendants-Appellants. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-97-CR-30-8 - - - - - - - - - - August 31, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* In this criminal appeal, Kevin Wayne Sauls, Douglas Wayne Evans, and Darren Miguel Tate challenge their convictions and sentences for making a false material statement to an agent of the federal government, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Tony Curtis Collins also challenges his sentence and conviction for conspiracy to possess a firearm by a convicted felon; possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number; and transfer of a firearm with an * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-50931 -2- obliterated serial number, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 2, 922(k) and 2, 924(a)(2) and 2, and 924(h) and 2. Evans and Tate contend that the indictment was insufficient to charge an offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and, with Sauls, that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Evans and Sauls additionally argue that the district court erred in refusing to suppress the statements they made to federal agents. Tate also argues that the district court erred in upwardly departing, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.9, in sentencing him. Collins’ sole argument is that he did not intelligently waive his right to counsel. We have reviewed the record and the defendant’s briefs and perceive no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgments of conviction and sentence are affirmed. AFFIRMED.