IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-30490
Summary Calendar
ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CLYDE TERRAL; MIKE VILLARD; CLIFFORD STRIDDER;
JAMES BUCK; CHARLES WAGNER,
Defendants-Appellees.
* * * * * * * * * *
__________________
c/w No. 98-30491
__________________
ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
KEITH PERKINS; JEFF CLARK; DALE PARKER; RAY DELCOMYN;
TOM RIBAUDO; CLIFFORD STRIDDER, III,
Defendants-Appellees.
* * * * * * * * * *
___________________
c/w No. 98-30492
____________________
ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CLIFFORD STRIDDER, III; THOMAS RIBAUDO,
Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 98-30490, 98-30491, 98-30492, 98-30493, 98-30494
-2-
* * * * * * * * * *
__________________
c/w No. 98-30493
__________________
ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CLYDE TERRAL; MIKE VILLARD; CHARLES WAGNER;
JAMES BUCK; CLIFFORD STRIDDER,
Defendants-Appellees.
* * * * * * * * * *
__________________
c/w No. 98-30494
___________________
ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JAMES BUCK; CHARLES WAGNER; VERNON CREECY;
WILLIAM HILTON; MIKE VILLARD; MONIQUE METOYER; JOHN DOE,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC Nos. 98-CV-38 c/w 98-CV-39, 98-CV-40,
98-CV-41, 98-CV-42
- - - - - - - - - -
August 26, 1998
Before SMITH, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Nos. 98-30490, 98-30491, 98-30492, 98-30493, 98-30494
-3-
Robert Kevin McCartney, Louisiana state prisoner #358987,
appeals from the district court’s dismissals of his five civil
rights complaints as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
These cases have been consolidated for purposes of this appeal.
McCartney argues that the district court erred by dismissing his
complaints as repetitious and duplicative of earlier litigation.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Because McCartney’s appeals are frivolous, they are DISMISSED.
See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th
Cir. R. 42.2.
We previously warned McCartney that additional frivolous
appeals would result in the imposition of sanctions against him.
Accordingly, McCartney is BARRED from filing any pro se civil
appeal in this court without the prior written approval of an
active judge of this court. Further, he is BARRED from filing
any pro se initial civil pleading in any court which is subject
to this court’s jurisdiction, without the advance written
permission of a judge of the forum court. The clerk of this
court and the clerks of all federal district courts subject to
the jurisdiction of this court are directed to return to
McCartney, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with
this bar.
APPEALS DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.