F I L E D
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MAY 8 2002
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
GEORGE GREGORY JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. No. 01-3151
(D.C. Nos. 96-CV-2055-GTV,
ANALYST INTERNATIONAL 96-CV-2056-GTV, 96-CV-2057-GTV,
CORPORATION; ANDERSEN 97-CV-2274-GTV, 97-CV-2457-GTV)
CONSULTING; YELLOW (D. Kansas)
TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.;
YELLOW LOGISTICS; YELLOW
FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC.;
YELLOW CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before KELLY , BRISCOE , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is
therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant George Gregory Jackson appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion for relief from judgment brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b). We review the denial of a 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion. Plotner v.
AT&T Corp. , 224 F.3d 1161, 1174 (10th Cir. 2000). “We will reverse the district
court’s determination only if we find a complete absence of a reasonable basis
and are certain that the district court’s decision is wrong.” Id. (quotation
omitted).
Having carefully reviewed the briefs, the record, and the applicable law,
we conclude that Mr. Jackson has failed to demonstrate that the district court
abused its discretion in denying his 60(b) motion. Accordingly, the judgment of
the United States District Court for the District of Kansas is AFFIRMED.
Entered for the Court
Mary Beck Briscoe
Circuit Judge
-2-