IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_________________________________
No. 98-10736
Summary Calendar
________________________________
MARY T. DODEN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LOCKHEED MARTIN VOUGHT SYSTEMS; STEVE BARANOWSKI,
Defendants-Appellees.
---------------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
(3:97-CV-1525-T)
---------------------------------
December 15, 1998
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant, Mary T. Doden (“Doden”), appeals from an
adverse summary judgment dismissing her claim brought
pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 12101-12117 (“ADA”). Rather than determine whether the
ADA would permit a cause of action for a hostile work
environment, the district court assumed that such an action
would be available and found the actions complained of were
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the
limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1
insufficient to constitute a claim for harassment. We agree
and affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court’s
order granting summary judgment dated May 20, 1998. See
also McConathy v. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up Corp., 131 F.3d 558,
563 (5th Cir. 1998).
AFFIRMED.
2