IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40450
Summary Calendar
MARY L. MABRY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER
OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:95-CV-578
- - - - - - - - - -
Decmeber 21, 1998
Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mary L. Mabry appeals the district court’s decision
affirming the determination by the Commissioner of Social
Security that Mabry is not disabled within the meaning of the
Social Security Act. Mabry argues that the administrative law
judge (ALJ) erred in failing to consider the combined or
cumulative impact of her mental and physical impairments. Mabry
also argues that the ALJ erred in applying the Medical-Vocational
Guidelines in 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, rather
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-40450
-2-
than obtaining the testimony of a vocational expert. We have
reviewed the record and Mabry’s brief and AFFIRM the district
court’s decision for essentially the same reasons set forth by
the district court. Mabry v. Apfel, No. 6:95-CV-578 (E.D. Tex.
February 17, 1998). The ALJ considered all of the impairments
claimed by Mabry and found that no nonexertional impairment
significantly affected her residual functional capacity. None of
the dispositive findings are shown to be erroneous or unsupported
by the record.
AFFIRMED.