F I L E D
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FEB 10 2005
TENTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 04-1113
(D.C. No. 00-CR-239 WM)
vs. (D. Colo.)
JUAN ALONSO CALDERON,
Defendant - Appellant.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before KELLY, HENRY, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges. **
Defendant-Appellant Juan Alonso Calderon appeals from his sentence
imposed for supervised release violations. Mr. Calderon’s counsel filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), and moved for leave
to withdraw. The brief was served upon Mr. Calderon and he was given proper
notice under 10th Cir. R. 46.4(B). He has not responded.
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
**
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge
panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material
assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th
Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Mr. Calderon originally pleaded guilty to bank larceny, a class C felony, 18
U.S.C. §§ 2113(b), 3559(a)(3), and was sentenced to five months imprisonment
and three years supervised release. After serving his prison term, he admitted to
violating the conditions of his supervised release and was sentenced to an
additional six months imprisonment and 27 months supervised release. However,
after being released from prison the second time, Mr. Calderon once again
violated his supervised release. The district court then revoked supervised release
and sentenced him to nine months imprisonment. It is this sentence Mr. Calderon
appeals.
We only reverse a sentence imposed for a supervised release violation if it
is “plainly unreasonable.” United States v. Kelley, 359 F.3d 1302, 1304 (10th
Cir. 2004). Here, the district judge was required to revoke Mr. Calderon’s
supervised release, IV R. at 7-8; 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g), and nine months
imprisonment was within the guideline range. U.S.S.G. §§ 7B1.1, 7B1.4.
Likewise, the sentence did not exceed the two-year maximum imprisonment term
for class C felonies. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); Kelley, 359 F.3d at 1303 n.1 (“All
revocation sentences . . . must be aggregated in calculating this two-year statutory
maximum.”). And as the district court considered the relevant factors in
rendering its decision, we cannot conclude the sentence is plainly unreasonable.
-2-
See IV R. at 18-23; see also Kelley, 359 F.3d at 1305; 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). 1
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as frivolous, and grant counsel’s
request to withdraw.
Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr.
Circuit Judge
1
In United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. __, 2005 WL 50108, at *25 (2005),
the Supreme Court expressly held that “Section 3553(a) remains in effect, and
sets forth numerous factors that guide sentencing.”
-3-