F I L E D
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MAR 15 2005
TENTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
No. 04-8040
v. (District of Wyoming)
(D.C. No. 03-CR-254-J)
MARTIN JAY AUNE,
Defendant-Appellant.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before EBEL, MURPHY, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has
determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs
without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This case is,
therefore, ordered submitted without oral argument.
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant-appellant Martin Jay Aune pleaded guilty to being a felon in
possession of firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). The
district court sentenced Aune to eighteen months’ imprisonment, three years’
supervised release, and a special assessment of $100. Aune contends that the
district court erred in finding that he did not qualify for a reduced offense level
under the so-called “sporting exception” contained in United States Sentencing
Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2K2.1(b)(2). Aune also argues that his sentence
violates the Sixth Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Blakely v.
Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3742(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
II. BACKGROUND
On May 6, 2003, a search warrant was executed at Aune’s residence in
Gillette, Wyoming. During the search, law enforcement officers located a door in
the downstairs part of the house which was blocked by a couch. Behind the door,
officers found empty firearm cases and a safe. Aune opened the safe. Inside the
safe were six firearms: (1) a Ruger, Model P-90, .45 caliber semi-automatic
pistol; (2) a Savage, Model 110, .270 caliber rifle; (3) a Marlin, Model 70, .22
caliber rifle; (4) an Armi Jager Laono, Model AP74, .22 caliber semi-automatic
-2-
rifle; (5) an SKS semi-automatic 7.62 caliber rifle; and (6) a Savage, Model 587,
.22 caliber semi-automatic rifle.
In April 2003, a few weeks before the search warrant was executed, a man
named David McCune stayed at Aune’s residence. McCune was later interviewed
by law enforcement officials and stated that Aune had displayed for McCune a
pistol from the locked room. McCune further stated that he asked why Aune, a
convicted felon, had the pistol and, according to McCune, Aune said that he was
not worried about being caught with the firearms because the weapons were in the
hidden room. McCune also told law enforcement officials that on a different
occasion Aune showed another person a firearm with a scope on it.
At the sentencing hearing, Aune testified that he possessed each of the
firearms identified above. Aune testified that the three .22 caliber rifles belonged
to his children, ages 10, 8, and 3. Aune said he had approximately a thousand
rounds of ammunition for the .22 caliber rifles so that his children could practice
shooting at targets. He testified that he used the .270 caliber bolt-action hunting
rifle to shoot targets and to hunt, and that he had about twenty rounds of
ammunition for the weapon. Aune stated that he took this rifle hunting in 1995
and in 2000 used it at a target range. Aune claimed that the SKS rifle belonged to
a friend of his who had given it to Aune for cleaning. He further testified that the
SKS came with approximately sixty rounds of ammunition that were included in
-3-
the clips to be cleaned. Aune acknowledged that he did not consider the SKS
rifle to be a hunting rifle. Aune also admitted to possessing the .45 caliber
handgun for which he had approximately twenty rounds of ammunition. Aune
stated that the .45 caliber handgun was primarily for his girlfriend’s protection,
but that it was also for hunting, namely for putting a wounded animal out of its
misery. Aune, however, could not recall a specific occasion when he used the .45
caliber handgun to put an animal out of its misery or that he ever took the firearm
hunting.
Aune further acknowledged that all the weapons were in a gun safe in a
locked closet with a couch placed directly in front of the closet door. He testified
that he kept the guns this way so that his children could not access the weapons.
Aune denied that the events described by McCune occurred, saying he did not
“know how [McCune] gathered that information” and that he did not possess a
rifle with a scope. Aune also acknowledged that he had been convicted of a
felony in 1986. He testified that he believed that five years after his conviction,
his civil rights were restored, including the right to possess firearms.
The only other person to testify at the sentencing hearing was Steven
Stensland, who testified that it was his SKS rifle found in Aune’s gun safe and
that he had given it to Aune to clean. He testified that he had purchased the SKS
rifle at a gun show in Gillette approximately two years before the hearing and that
-4-
he had taken the rifle hunting. Stensland described himself as a gun collector and
estimated that he owned approximately twenty-seven or twenty-eight guns.
Stensland further testified that he had made no attempt to retrieve the SKS rifle
from law enforcement.
The district court concluded that Aune did not qualify under the “sporting
exception” in § 2K2.1(b)(2) because he did not possess all the weapons solely for
“lawful sporting purposes.” Based on Aune’s criminal history category III and an
adjusted base offense level of thirteen 1, the district court sentenced Aune to
eighteen months’ imprisonment followed by a three-year term of supervised
release. Aune filed a timely notice of appeal and now challenges his sentence.
III. DISCUSSION
A. Sporting Exception
Aune argues that the district court erred in finding that he did not qualify
for a reduced offense level under the “sporting exception” contained in U.S.S.G.
§ 2K2.1(b)(2). Section 2K2.1(b)(2) states in relevant part:
If the defendant . . . possessed all ammunition and firearms solely for
lawful sporting purposes or collection, and did not unlawfully
This adjusted base offense level was calculated as follows: the base
1
offense level of fourteen under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(6)(A) was adjusted upward
two levels as directed by § 2K2.1(b)(1)(A) for the number of firearms possessed
and then reduced by three levels for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to §
3E1.1(a) and (b). This adjusted base offense level and Aune’s criminal history
category resulted in Guidelines range of eighteen to twenty-four months.
-5-
discharge or otherwise unlawfully use such firearms or ammunition,
decrease the offense level determined . . . to level 6.
U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(2) (2003). 2 The application notes to § 2K2.1(b)(2) state that
whether firearms are possessed for “lawful sporting purposes or collection” is
“determined by the surrounding circumstances” which include “the number and
type of firearms, the amount and type of ammunition, the location and
circumstances of possession and actual use, the nature of the defendant’s criminal
history (e.g., prior convictions for offenses involving firearms), and the extent to
which possession was restricted by local law.” U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(2), cmt. n.10.
The defendant has the burden to show that § 2K2.1(b)(2) applies. United
States v. Collins, 313 F.3d 1251, 1254 (10th Cir. 2002). After reviewing the
record, we conclude that the district court did not err in declining to reduce
Aune’s sentence pursuant to § 2K2.1(b)(2). Aune failed to provide any support
for his assertion that the .270 caliber rifle was used for hunting and target
shooting. The court also relied on Aune’s admission that he possessed about a
thousand rounds of hollow-point ammunition for the .22 caliber firearms allegedly
for use by Aune’s children. Perhaps most importantly, Aune admitted that the .45
caliber handgun had never been taken hunting and that it was for his girlfriend’s
Because Aune was sentenced in March 2004, all citations to the
2
Sentencing Guidelines are to the 2003 version of the United States Sentencing
Commission Guidelines Manual.
-6-
protection, which is indisputably not a “sporting purpose.” The court also
considered the substantial number of firearms and the fact that the guns were kept
in a hidden closet, which, combined with the statements by McCune, suggested to
the court that Aune knew he was in violation of the law. The district court
therefore did not err when it concluded that Aune was not entitled to a reduction
under § 2K2.1(b)(2) because Aune failed to carry his burden to show that all the
firearms were “solely for lawful sporting purposes.”
B. Sixth Amendment Claim under Blakely v. Washington
Aune also argues that under Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004),
his Sixth Amendment rights were violated when the district court enhanced his
sentence by two levels pursuant to § 2K2.1(b)(1) because he possessed between
three and seven firearms. The indictment to which Aune pleaded guilty, however,
charged him with possession of six specifically identified firearms. Because the
district court did not enhance Aune’s sentence based on any facts not admitted by
Aune regarding the number of weapons he possessed, Aune’s Sixth Amendment
rights were not violated. 3 Blakely, 124 S. Ct. at 2537 (noting that the Sixth
3
Aune does not argue that the district court’s factual findings related to his
qualification under the “sporting exception” violated his Sixth Amendment rights.
Furthermore, because Aune does not assert that the district court erred under
United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), we need not consider its
application to his appeal.
-7-
Amendment is implicated when a sentence is imposed on facts not found by a jury
or admitted by the defendant).
IV. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the sentence imposed by the
district court.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT
Michael R. Murphy
Circuit Judge
-8-