F I L E D
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS
April 9, 2007
TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
M ICHA EL LEE STR OPE, also known
as Gordon E. Strope,
Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 05-3344
(D.C. No. 04-CV-3204-JTM )
v. (D . Kan.)
DAVID R. M cKUNE, W arden,
Lansing C orrectional Facility; JASON
SU TTLEY, Officer, Lansing
C orrectional Facility; TA BO R
M EDILL, Counselor, Lansing
Correctional Facility; R. SUTTLES,
Counselor, Lansing Correctional
Facility; FRANK DORION, Kitchen
M anager, Lansing Correctional
Facility; DUA NE M UCKENTHALER,
Counselor, Lansing Correctional
Facility; CO LLETTE
W INKELBAUER, Classification Staff,
Lansing C orrectional Facility; ANN
M CDOW ELL, Lansing Correctional
Facility; W ILLIAM CU M M INGS,
Assistant for the Secretary of
Corrections; M IKE NEVE, Deputy
W arden, Lansing Correctional Facility,
in their individual capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
OR D ER AND JUDGM ENT *
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,
however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th
Cir. R. 32.1.
Before KELLY, O’BRIEN, and TYM KOVICH, Circuit Judges. **
Plaintiff-Appellant M ichael Lee Strope, a state inmate appearing pro se,
appealed the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action against State
corrections personnel, without prejudice, and the denial of his motion to
reconsider. The district court’s dismissal was predicated on a “total exhaustion”
requirement for § 1983 suits involving prison conditions. See 42 U.S.C. §
1997e(a); Ross v. County of Bernalillo, 365 F.3d 1181, 1189-90 (10th Cir. 2004),
overruled by Jones v. Bock, 127 S. Ct. 910 (2007); Steele v. Fed. Bureau of
Prisons, 355 F.3d 1204, 1211 (10th Cir. 2003), overruled by Jones v. Bock, 127 S.
Ct. 910 (2007); see also Freeman v. W atkins, –F.3d–, 2007 W L 779273, at *2
(10th Cir. 2007) (noting that Jones v. Bock overruled R oss and Steele);
Aquilar-Avellaveda v. Terrell, 478 F.3d 1223 (10th Cir. 2007) (same). W e
affirmed, noting that it appeared that M r. Strope had not exhausted all of his
claims w hen he filed his complaint and that evidence concerning his attempts to
exhaust came too late given summary judgment proceedings. Strope v. M cKune,
No. 05-344, 2006 W L 246138, at *1 (10th Cir. Feb. 2, 2006), vacated 127 S. Ct.
**
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge
panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material
assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th
Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-
1215 (2007). The Supreme Court vacated our judgment for reconsideration in
light of Jones v. Bock and we recalled our mandate. W e now reverse the district
court’s orders dismissing and denying reconsideration and remand this case for
reconsideration in light of Jones v. Bock.
W e remind M r. Strope that he must continue to make partial payments until
the entirety of his appellate filing fee balance is paid.
REVERSED. The district court’s orders dismissing the action and denying
reconsideration are VACATED, and the case is REM ANDED, for proceedings
consistent with this Order and Judgment.
Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr.
Circuit Judge
-3-