F I L E D
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
PUBLISH
April 3, 2006
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
TENTH CIRCUIT
STATE OF WYOMING and WYOMING
WOOL GROWERS, WYOMING STOCK
GROWERS ASSOCIATION; WYOMING
FARM BUREAU FEDERATION;
WYOMING ASSOCIATION OF
CONSERVATION DISTRICTS; ROCKY
MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION;
WYOMING COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ASSOCIATION; BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF
CAMPBELL; BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF
SUBLETTE; BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF Nos. 05-8026, 05-8027, 05-8035
WASHAKIE; WYOMING ASSOCIATION
OF COUNTY PREDATORY ANIMAL
BOARDS; FREMONT COUNTY
PREDATORY ANIMAL BOARD; TETON
COUNTY PREDATORY ANIMAL
BOARD; CONVERSE COUNTY
PREDATORY ANIMAL BOARD;
WYOMING OUTFITTERS AND GUIDES
ASSOCIATION; GREEN RIVER VALLEY
CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION; UPPER
GREEN RIVER CATTLE ASSOCIATION;
WYOMING BUSINESS ALLIANCE;
CODY COUNTY OUTFITTERS AND
GUIDES ASSOCIATION; FOUNDATION
FOR NORTH AMERICAN WILD SHEEP;
JACKSON HOLE OUTFITTERS AND
GUIDES; ROCK SPRINGS DISTRICT 4
GRAZING BOARD; SPORTSMEN FOR
FISH & WILDLIFE, WYOMING;
SPORTSMEN FOR FISH & WILDLIFE,
PARK COUNTY; SPORTSMEN FOR FISH
& WILDLIFE, TETON COUNTY;
SPORTSMEN FOR FISH & WILDLIFE,
LINCOLN COUNTY; SPORTSMEN FOR
FISH & WILDLIFE, UTAH,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
TIMOTHY J. MORRISON; MARIE A.
FONTAINE; TIM A. FRENCH, in their
official capacity as the Board of County
Commissioners of Park County, State of
Wyoming,
Plaintiffs - Intervenors -
Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
INTERIOR; UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE; GALE NORTON, in
her capacity as the Secretary of the United
States Department of Interior; STEVEN A.
WILLIAMS, in his official capacity as the
Director of the United States Fish &
Wildlife Service;
Defendants - Appellees,
GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION;
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION;
JACKSON HOLE CONSERVATION
ALLIANCE; PREDATOR
CONSERVATION ALLIANCE;
WYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL;
-2-
SIERRA CLUB; NATURAL RESOURCES
DEFENSE COUNCIL,
Defendants - Intervenors -
Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING
(D. Ct. No. 04-CV-0123-J)
Jay Arthur Jerde, Deputy Attorney General (Patrick J. Crank, Attorney General,
with him on the briefs), Office of the Attorney General for the State of Wyoming,
appearing for Appellant State of Wyoming.
Harriett M. Hageman (Kara Brighton, with her on the briefs), Hageman &
Brighton, P.C., Cheyenne, Wyoming, appearing for Appellant Wyoming Wool
Growers, et al.
Bryan A. Skoric, Park County Attorney, James Fred Davis, Deputy Park County
Attorney, Cody, Wyoming, on the briefs for Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant Park
County.
David C. Shilton, Attorney, United States Department of Justice (Kelly A.
Johnson, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Environmental and Natural
Resources Division; Kristen L. Gustafson, Jimmy A. Rodriguez, and M. Alice
Thurston, Attorneys, United States Department of Justice; and David Gayer and
Margot Zallen, Office of the Solicitor, United States Department of Justice, with
him on the brief), appearing for the Federal Appellees.
Douglas L. Honnold, Abigail Dillen, and Timothy J. Preso, EARTHJUSTICE,
Bozeman, Montana, on the briefs for Intervenor-Appellees Sierra Club and
Natural Resources Defense Council.
Jack R. Tuholske, Tuholske Law Office, P.C., Missoula, Montana, and Thomas
M. France, Montana Wildlife Federation, Missoula, Montana, on the briefs for
Defendants-Intervenors Greater Yellowstone Coalition, National Wildlife
Federation, and Predator Conservation Alliance.
-3-
Before TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge, EBEL, Circuit Judge, and CASSELL,
District Judge. †
PER CURIAM.
The State of Wyoming filed this suit in the District of Wyoming against
Gale A. Norton in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States
Department of the Interior (“DOI”) 1 and Steven A. Williams in his official
capacity as the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”). 2
The District Court consolidated this case with a similar suit brought against the
DOI and the FWS by a group of organizations known collectively as the Wolf
Coalition. The District Court also granted several motions to intervene submitted
by parties on both sides of this matter. The facts of this case are fully set forth in
the District Court’s opinion. See Wyoming v. U.S. Dept. of Interior, 360 F. Supp.
2d 1214, 1245 (D. Wyo. 2005).
The Plaintiffs alleged various constitutional claims under Article IV’s
†
The Honorable Paul G. Cassell, District Judge of the United States District
Court for the District of Utah, sitting by designation.
1
Secretary Norton resigned from the DOI in March 2006. President Bush
recently nominated Governor Dirk Kempthorne to succeed her as Secretary. His
nomination is currently awaiting confirmation in the Senate.
2
Director Steven A. Williams resigned from the FWS in March 2005 and
was replaced by H. Dale Hall in October 2005.
-4-
Guarantee Clause and the Tenth Amendment, as well as violations of the
Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq., the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., and the Administrative
Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq., in connection with the DOI’s and
the FWS’s alleged failure to manage and control the gray wolf population in
Wyoming and their failure to initiate delisting of the gray wolf as an endangered
species. After reviewing the briefs and the administrative record, and after
hearing oral argument, the District Court issued a thorough Memorandum Opinion
and Order denying relief on all causes of action and dismissing the case.
Wyoming, 360 F. Supp. 2d at 1245.
With respect to the statutory claims, the District Court concluded that the
Plaintiffs neither identified a “final agency action” nor demonstrated that the
Defendants “unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed” statutorily required
action necessary for judicial review under the APA. See Wyoming, 360 F. Supp.
2d at 1231–34, 1236 (citing Colo. Farm Bureau Fed’n v. U.S. Forest Serv., 220
F.3d 1171 (10th Cir.2000) and Norton v. S. Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S.
55 (2004)). Accordingly, the District Court dismissed the statutory causes of
action. With respect to the Plaintiffs’ constitutional claims, the District Court
concluded that the Defendants’ actions “are consistent with the powers delegated
to them by Congress through the ESA via the Commerce Clause, and these actions
-5-
do not invade any province of Wyoming’s state sovereignty reserved by the Tenth
Amendment.” Id. at 1244. Accordingly, the District Court denied relief on these
claims.
We take jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and AFFIRM the judgment of
the District Court for substantially the same reasons given in its opinion. See
Wyoming, 360 F. Supp. 2d at 1214–36, 1238–45. Because we hold, however, that
the Plaintiffs have failed to identify a final agency action which is necessary to
satisfy the statutory standing requirements under the APA, see Utah v. Babbit,
137 F.3d 1193, 1203 (10th Cir. 1998) (stating that without agency action
plaintiffs have no standing to sue under the APA), unlike the District Court, we
express no opinion on the merits of the Plaintiffs’ ESA and NEPA claims, see
Wyoming, 360 F. Supp. 2d at 1236–38 (holding in the alternative that Plaintiffs’
NEPA claim fails on the merits). Finally, we DENY all outstanding motions.
-6-