Biddie v. Spears

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 98-10114
                        Conference Calendar



HAROLD CURTIS BIDDIE, ET AL.,

                                           Plaintiffs,

HAROLD CURTIS BIDDIE; MALCOLM LOUIS JACKSON,

                                           Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

LEE A. SPEARS; BRENDA R. WILKINSON; ALL DEFENDANTS,

                                           Defendants-Appellees.

                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 7-97-CV-241-X
                       - - - - - - - - - -

                          April 19, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Harold Curtis Biddie, Texas inmate # 488840, challenges the

dismissal without prejudice of his civil rights complaint filed

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for want of prosecution under Fed.

R. Civ. P. 41(b).   As requested, Malcolm Louis Jackson, Texas

inmate # 655798, is not a party to this appeal, and his motion to

join the appeal is DENIED as moot.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 98-10114
                                 -2-

     Biddie’s appeal of the dismissal of his suit for want of

prosecution is frivolous.    See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); McCullough

v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th Cir. 1988).     Therefore, his

appeal is DISMISSED.   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.    His motion for

appointment of counsel is DENIED.

     District courts have barred Biddie from proceeding in forma

pauperis in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) unless he is

under imminent danger of serious physical injury.     It is not

clear, however, that he was barred before he filed the instant

appeal.   He is now barred unquestionably.     See § 1915(g);

Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996); Biddie v.

Meade, No. H-97-2726 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 1997); Biddie v.

Negbenebor, No. H-97-2375 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 20, 1997); see also

Biddie v. Polk, No. 1:96 cv695 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 30, 1998); Biddie

v. Gillard, No. H-97-2119 (S.D. Tex. June 9, 1998); Biddie v.

Dale, No. H-97-2728 (S.D. Tex. June 16, 1998).

     MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; APPELLANT BARRED.        See

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).