FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 07 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE VALENCIA-LOPEZ, No. 08-71335
Petitioner, Agency No. A079-580-333
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 23, 2010 **
Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Jose Valencia-Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen
removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying as untimely Valencia-
Lopez’s motion to reopen because it was filed more than 90 days after the BIA’s
final removal order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Valencia-Lopez did not show
he acted with the due diligence required for equitable tolling, see Singh v.
Gonzales, 491 F.3d 1090, 1096-97 (9th Cir. 2007).
In light of our disposition, we need not reach Valencia-Lopez’s remaining
contentions.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 08-71335