UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7391
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MARTIN F. SALAZAR,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(1:06-cr-00123-MBS-1)
Submitted: September 10, 2010 Decided: September 20, 2010
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martin F. Salazar, Appellant Pro Se. Dean A. Eichelberger,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Martin F. Salazar appeals the district court’s order
denying his repetitive motion for a new trial. The district
court had previously denied several motions by Salazar for a new
trial, including two motions raising essentially the identical
“new evidence” raised in Salazar’s instant motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Salazar, No. 1:06-cr-00123-MBS-1 (D.S.C. April 7, 2008
& June 29, 2009). We deny Salazar’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2