United States v. Harold

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPT 22, 2010 No. 10-10738 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:97-cr-00314-HES-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CLAUDE N. HAROLD, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (September 22, 2010) Before BARKETT, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Maurice C. Grant, II, appointed counsel for Claude N. Harold in this appeal from the revocation of Harold’s supervised release and subsequent imposition of an 11-month sentence, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Harold’s supervised release and his sentence are AFFIRMED. 2