United States v. Isaid Herrera

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 04 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10481 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cr-00595-DCB v. MEMORANDUM * ISAID HERRERA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 13, 2010 ** Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Isaid Herrera appeals from the 63-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Herrera contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The district court did not procedurally err. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Moreover, in light of the totality of the circumstances, the district court’s sentence at the low end of the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable. See id. AFFIRMED. 2 09-10481