United States v. Larry Pritchett

Case: 10-10034 Document: 00511254884 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/06/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 6, 2010 No. 10-10034 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LARRY DEWAYNE PRITCHETT, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:09-CR-123-1 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Larry Dewayne Pritchett has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Pritchett has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. The record does reveal a clerical error in the judgment. The judgment should be corrected to reflect that for Counts Four, Five, and Six, Pritchett was * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 10-10034 Document: 00511254884 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/06/2010 No. 10-10034 convicted and sentenced for conspiracy to commit bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2113(a), rather than bank robbery under § 2113(a); and for Count Seven, Pritchett was convicted and sentenced for attempted bank robbery, rather than bank robbery. See F ED. R. C RIM. P. 36. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for correction of the clerical error pursuant to F ED. R. C RIM. P. 36. 2