FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 06 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
L. SEVILLE PARKS, No. 08-16215
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:06-cv-00602-RLH-
LRL
v.
ROBERT CHAMBLISS; et al., MEMORANDUM *
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Roger L. Hunt, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 13, 2010 **
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
L. Seville Parks, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to comply with
a court order to amend his complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
639, 640 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Parks’s action
for failure to comply with a court order where the district court described the
inadequacies of Parks’s complaint and gave him ample time to amend, and Parks
failed to pursue the case for over six months without providing any reason for the
delay. See id. at 642-43.
Parks’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
To the extent that there are any outstanding motions, they are denied.
AFFIRMED.
2 08-16215