United States v. John Schlabach

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 06 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-35135 Petitioner - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00095-CI v. MEMORANDUM * JOHN J. SCHLABACH, Respondent - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Fred Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 22, 2010 ** Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. The district court did not clearly err by granting the petition because John Schlabach (“Schlabach”) failed to rebut the government’s showing that the summons was issued in good faith. See Stewart v. United States, 511 F.3d 1251, 1254-55 (9th Cir. 2008) (taxpayer’s heavy burden to show abuse of process or lack * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 09-35135 of good faith once government makes prima facie showing summons was issued in good faith). Schlabach’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. AFFIRMED. 2 09-35135