United States v. Phillip Karl Prescott

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCTOBER 27, 2010 No. 10-11093 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:07-cr-00471-SDM-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PHILLIP KARL PRESCOTT, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (October 27, 2010) Before BLACK, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: A. Fitzgerald Hall, appointed counsel for Phillip Karl Prescott, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Prescott’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. 2