NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., and
HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellants,
v.
NOKIA CORPORATION, NOKIA INC., FUJITSU
LIMITED, FUJITSU AMERICA, INC., FUJITSU
COMPUTER PRODUCTS OF AMERICA, INC., ALL
AROUND CO. LTD., BOE-HYDIS TECHNOLOGY
CO. LTD., PICVUE ELECTRONICS LIMITED,
CURITEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., KONINKLIJK
PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V., HIGH TECH
COMPUTER CORPORATION, WISTRON
CORPORATION, MATSUSHITA ELETRICAL
INDUSTRIAL CO., MATSUSHITA ELECTRONICAL
CORPORATION OF AMERICA, SEIKO EPSON
CORPORATION, ARGUS (also known as Hartford
Computer Group.), TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., and
TOSHIBA CORPORATION,
Defendants,
and
FUJIFILM CORPORATION and FUJIFILM U.S.A.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA INC. and SAMSUNG SDI
CO. LTD.,
Defendants-Appellees.
____________________
2010-1121
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in consolidated Case Nos.
04-CV-1337, 04-CV-1338, 04-CV-1536, and 05-CV-0874,
Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MARTIN R. LUECK, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi
L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiffs-
appellants. With him on the brief were MATTHEW L.
WOODS and STACIE E. OBERTS.
LAWRENCE ROSENTHAL, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan
LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants-
appellees Fujifilm Corporation, et al. With him on the
brief were IAN G. DIBERNARDO, ANGIE M. HANKINS, and
MATTHEW W. SIEGAL.
STEPHEN S. KORNICZKY, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter &
Hampton LLP, of San Diego, California, argued for
defendants-appellees Samsung SDI America Inc., et al.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LINN, and PROST, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 1, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly _____________
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk